Posted by: martinoutlook | December 12, 2009

I’m feeling sad tonight

. . . because today closed out the fall semester of classes at Union College, where I’ve been teaching Christian ethics. I’ve had 44 sessions with my “kids”–63 of them, an unusually large class. Increased responsibilities for the Mid-America Union will prevent me from teaching any more college classes; I’m excited about serving our president, Roscoe Howard, yet I’ll also miss being an adjunct professor at my favorite college.

My students this semester generated awesome discussions about many vital moral issues and their implications. Time and time again I’ve reported to Darlene (my wife) how much I’m impressed with these young adults, who have gained such spiritual maturity before even graduating. Many of them have already served as overseas student missionaries or domestic task force workers. Most are nursing students; some are preparing for a career as pastors, educators and attorneys. In many ways, I believe their spirituality–both their discernment and their dedication–surpasses most church members of my generation.

For example, the other day we discussed abortion, and each student wrote a paper on the topic. I was deeply touched that nearly all of them had profound respect for the unborn life which God implants in the womb–much more respect than most adults I talk to. It’s amazing. Here are these students, whose age would seem to identify them with the “hook-up generation,” which in our society is marked by casual sex and “easy come, easy go” pregnancies. And yet my students expressed deep conviction and respect regarding unborn life from God! And this was before I even tried to teach them on the topic.

Where did they get their morals from?

Probably not from my generation, I’m ashamed to admit. Too many of us seem to qualify as lukewarm Laodicea. Meanwhile, many my age who haven’t succumbed to spiritual lethargy go to the other extreme, expending time and energy swatting moral gnats while swallowing camels of inconsistency.

Please do not take offense at my reluctant observations. Instead, if you consider yourself “pro choice” about abortion, would you ponder several questions:

1) If a fetus in the womb is not a real human being, please explain what might have been inside Mary’s womb for nine months. Did Jesus, the eternal Word, cease to exist as a living being when He lived unborn within His mother?

2) We sometimes hear that a fetus cannot be a person because it isn’t “viable,” often defined by the fact that the unborn can’t breathe on their own. Well, if self-breathing is the test of life, what happens if you have an accident and go on a hospital respirator? Do you cease do exist as a person when you cannot breathe on your own? What warrant do we have for such thinking–in logic, in science or in Scripture?

3) Who made us the lords of life and death, so that we imagine ourselves qualified to decide whether unborn life survives or gets exterminated?

I acknowledge the moral dilemma raised by a small percentage of pregnancies (no more than two to four percent) resulting from incest or rape, involve grave fetal abnormality, or threaten the life of the mother. (Notice I didn’t say “health” of the mother, which often includes the deceptive loophole of “emotional health”–such as trauma resulting from having a career interrupted by the inconvenient duty of changing diapers.) Abortions in the small minority of truly controversial situations are not necessarily in the same moral category as abortions of inconvenience. We can discuss exceptional situations while uniting against the cavalier attitude toward unborn human life that allows a living fetus to be sacrificed and discarded as trash, essentially being morally equivalent to a diseased tumor.

I contrast the convictions of these noble young people at Union College with the statement of a high church leader (now retired), who during a 1992 debate about abortion on the General Conference Executive Committee, described the procedure as the “interruption of pregnancy.” I rose to challenge his assertion, asking: “If abortion is merely the interruption of pregnancy, please explain to us how the pregnancy can get started again.” No answer was forthcoming, then or since.

I have no desire to argue about abortion or anything else with those who have their minds made up (as mine obviously is on this point).  I mostly wanted to say a word of affirmation and appreciation for those younger Adventists who, regarding abortion and several other vital moral issues, often surpass their own parents and grandparents in spiritual discernment. It was my joy this semester to interact with these students–not only to mentor them in Christian ethics, but also to learn from them.

God bless you, my young friends. I will miss seeing you in class. Our church desperately needs you, not just in our pews, but up front in leadership and in our board rooms.

Martin Weber, Mid-America Union assistant to the president, communication director and Outlook editor

Posted by: martinoutlook | November 27, 2009

Death of a friend

The death of a friend is one of life’s deepest sorrows, and it seems particularly cruel during the holidays. Word just arrived that Elder James Cress passed away yesterday (Thanksgiving, Nov. 26) from illness.

Dr. Cress, known to all as simply “Jim,” was dear to Mid-America, having served as ministerial director of our Union before he took the same role for the world field. It was my privilege to serve him at the General Conference Ministerial Association. My mind is flooded with memories as I think of my friend.

Back in 1993, life changed dramatically when Jim arrived at church headquarters. Everything got 50% busier for everybody. Many times he called me to his office with some grand new project for the world field. His passion was to equip pastors in developing regions with ministerial resources. He was a genius at pulling strings and finding funds to make things happen.

I particularly remember when he got the SDA Bible Commentary published at an incredibly low price to distribute to pastors overseas, whose previous library consisted of only the Bible, perhaps a concordance and several of Ellen White’s books. Each year Jim managed to get one or two additional books published for them. Often he depended upon me to compile them, continuing to engage me in freelance projects after I left the Association. Our latest joint effort happened this past year: a strategic partnership with Logos Bible Software to—you guessed it—get their product at extremely low cost into the hands of poverty-stricken pastors in four world divisions. It is to be funded by an ingenious profit-sharing plan from sales to other pastors who can afford Logos software.

Jim was a great businessman—a real win-win dealmaker. No question he could have been a millionaire had he not been a servant of the church. I just loved the guy for his unselfish service for the Savior.

I also enjoyed Jim’s sense of humor. More than some highly-placed religious leaders, Jim knew how to laugh. He was particularly amused by the antics of politically-minded people whose efforts to promote themselves backfired.

Jim’s ministry partner all these years has been his faithful wife, Sharon. The two of them together were a blessing to the whole world field. They had no children of their own; instead they had Dexter, a tiny Scottish Terrier upon whom they lavished parental love. After Dexter got old and had to be put to sleep, Jim and Sharon grieved awhile before getting another Scottie.

Jim had an eclectic collection of Noah’s arks of various colors and sizes; the hallway outside his office where he had them all arranged was a favorite stopping point of visitors touring General Conference headquarters.

Perhaps the most touching thing about Jim was how he still cared for Maxine, his long-retired secretary who worked with him when he was here at the Mid-America Union. It’s been 20 years or so since they served together, but every week to the present time Jim sent her a greeting card at least once a week. I saw them in the parking lot of Walgreens a few months ago; Jim didn’t look good at all. I was afraid he wasn’t going to live long, and so it came not as a shock to hear the sad news tonight.

Those who knew Jim will sorely miss him. Our comfort is that in which he found such inspiration: the blessed hope of the soon coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Sleep well, Jim. We’ll see you in the morning.

***

Here is the announcement that came from the GC today:

“Dr. James A. Cress, Ministerial Secretary of the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists, died on Thanksgiving evening, November 26, 2009 of complications arising from a rare pathogen believed to have been contracted in the course of his travels.  Upon his return from the last of his itineraries, the infection worsened.  Despite the very best medical care and a valiant struggle, consistent with Pastor Cress’s energetic approach to Christian service, he succumbed rapidly and now rests peacefully from his labors.  He awaits the fulfillment of the blessed hope that characterized His personal life and public ministry.

“Our thoughts and prayers go to Jim’s wife, Sharon. She is an associate secretary of the Ministerial Association, in charge of Shepherdess International, a ministry to pastor’s spouses and children. Jim is also survived by a brother, John C. Cress, of College Place, Washington, an Adventist pastor who serves with Adventist Health Care. A third brother, David Cress, who had been president of the Georgia-Cumberland Conference of Seventh-day Adventists, died in an airplane crash in December of 2004.

A memorial service is anticipated for December 5, 2009, at Sligo Seventh-day Adventist Church in Takoma Park, Maryland. More details will be communicated when they become available. More information is at www.news.adventist.org.”

 

 

Posted by: martinoutlook | November 18, 2009

Website sdaforme.com featured in November Adventist World magazine!

We are happy that our world church featured www.sdaforme.com in November’s Adventist World magazine on the president’s page (p. 13). Mid-America Union President Roscoe J. Howard III wrote a guest editorial promoting the website.

Elder Howard says, “What I most like about the Web site is its positive spirit. Weber and the McConnells counter the attacks against Adventist truth without counterattacking those who oppose us [the SDA church]. They offer gracious responses, taking to heart the apostle Paul’s counsel in 2 Timothy 2:25: ‘Gently instruct those who oppose the truth. Perhaps God will change those people’s hearts, and they will learn the truth.’”

I hope so. That’s our goal, anyway. We want www.sdaforme.com to be represent the loving Spirit of Jesus Christ, not a combative spirit of contention. Our warfare is against the devil’s attacks upon Adventist truth, not against people who oppose us. I am heartsick at the mean spirit of so much of theological discussion, and we will not permit that website to showcase hateful or insulting responses. This is the main reason we are not posting comments anymore.

I understand the pain and frustration so many have felt after suffering legalism, and my heart goes out to you. If you are ready to sit down with us and try to figure out where do you go from here, www.sdaforme.com is available as a resource to help you on that journey.

Another reason I’m not taking comments on www.sdaforme.com anymore is that life has gotten so busy for me. I am now assistant to the president of the Mid-America Union on top of my ongoing communication responsibilities. This involves extra travel and other new responsibilities. I’m adjunct teaching at Union College, and trying to keep Outlook magazine coming every month to the 63,000 members of the Mid-America Union. Added to that is my volunteer work with The Hope of Survivors for victims of clergy sexual abuse.

Given all this, I’m even way behind on answering e-mails and have no hope of catching up until after I’m done teaching my class this semester at Union College. My apologies.

There are many new things we want to post on www.sdaforme.com, plus videos and other media materials. Meanwhile, please browse around what we have posted here. If you haven’t read the “Welcome . . . About this site” on the homepage, please do. It will give you an idea of what we are hoping to accomplish here.

May God be with you all as we enter this Thanksgiving season, with gratitude most of all for His mercy and truth in Jesus Christ.

 

Grace and peace,

 

Martin Weber, DMin

Assistant to the president, Mid-America Union

Communication director and editor, Outlook magazine

Chairman of the board, The Hope of Survivors of clergy sexual abuse

(a non-compensated position)

 

Posted by: martinoutlook | November 6, 2009

My 40th Class Reunion


It hardly seems possible that 40 years ago I graduated from high school. Last weekend our academy class of ‘69 met at an oceanfront hotel on the east coast. I won’t say where because I don’t want to identify our academy, which has since gone out of business. Most of my classmates have also gone out of business, as far as the church is concerned. Only seven or eight of the 23 in our small graduating class are still active Seventh-day Adventists.

The most amazing thing, to me, is that some of those who left our church because of the dysfunctions they experienced have since become fulfilled, fruitful and fervent Christians in other denominations.

In my worship talk to my former classmates, I testified about how I finally discovered the grace and truth of Jesus in the context of Seventh-day Adventism. For example, I keep the Sabbath now because Jesus is the Lord of the Sabbath, and the seventh day is God’s symbol of entering Gospel rest. This is a drastically different experience than I was taught to have at the academy, I confessed to them. For most of us back then, the Sabbath seemed like a 24-hour tightrope stretched across the end of the week for the sake of a spiritual performance before God and humanity. (I can’t speak for everyone–just for myself and what I observed back then; but I think my perceptions are attested to by the fact that two thirds of our class has abandoned the Sabbath.)

No doubt our teachers did the best they could–and several of them were truly wonderful people. But somehow what the academy taught us may have been more like the way the Pharisees kept the Sabbath back in Jesus’ time.

Then along came Jesus, who proclaimed: “You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free” (John 8:32). And now I do experience God’s freedom and grace in the context of Seventh-day Adventist doctine–but it didn’t come easy. It was a journey of decades through the valley of dysfunction and spiritual abuse until finally, 32 years ago, I experienced the truth as it is in Jesus.

One of my classmates who left the church and found fellowship elsewhere came to me privately and said, “Do you really enjoy the Sabbath now? Do you really experience Jesus in keeping that day?”

Yes indeed. She promised to check it out by visiting our new website, www.sda4me.com. I hope she does. I think she will conclude that the truth as it is in Jesus is worth its wait in gold, even if it takes 40 years to discover it.

Meanwhile, I thank God for the present state of Adventist Christian education in the Mid-America Union. None of the abuses that our class suffered 40 to 50 years ago exist anywhere in our territory, as far as I have seen or heard in my travels and correspondence. We have grace-based, compassionate and capable teachers, and school administrators, throughout our nine-state region, and they are making a difference for eternity in the lives of their students.

Posted by: martinoutlook | October 23, 2009

Connecting with Adventist students on secular campuses

This week I’ve been participating in the 180° Symposium, in which representatives from four world divisions meet once a year at Andrews University to discuss how to prevent attrition of Adventist young adults. The 2009 meeting was devoted to connecting with our students who attend secular campuses, whom we tend to lose in tragic proportions. The bottom line question: How can local churches near these secular universities be places of refuge for them and their friends?

Participants prepared papers to present to the group for discussion. Mine was entitled: “When the Canaries Stop Singing.” Here it is:
Before the days of modern technology, coal miners placed canaries in cages throughout their subterranean tunnels as an early warning against the invasion of carbon monoxide. The toxic gas often seeped into mines, odorless and thus undetected. The dying of songbirds provided an early warning that the miners were endangered in an atmosphere of systemic toxin. When the canaries stopped singing, it was the first sign that everybody in the mines was doomed unless they could get to fresh air.

For the Seventh-day Adventist Church in North America, the canaries are ceasing to sing. We are losing our young people, and our churches themselves are dying. Paul Richardson of the Center for Creative Ministry reports: “The median age for the Seventh-day Adventist community in North America, including the unbaptized children in church families, is 58. … Among native-born White and Black members, the median age is even higher.”[i]

Symposium colleague Ed Dickerson cites another study of Adventists in North America which confirms that more than half of attending members are 58 years or older.”[ii] Richardson adds the chilling statement: “There are more than 1,000 local churches in the North American Division that have no children or teens at all.”[iii]

Confronted with the loss of these songbirds, what should we do?

Many church leaders, concerned about losing our youth and young adults (YYAs), focus on what can be done to persuade them to stay with us—as if the solution to a noxious atmosphere is to develop a strain of poison-resistant victims.

Let us remember that the loss of our YYAs is evidence that our entire church system suffers from a toxic atmosphere; it’s just that YYAs are the most vulnerable to it. Their demise warns of impending doom for all. Our task is to identify what’s poisoning our YYAs and then lead our whole church into life-giving fresh air.

My thesis is that the toxin we suffer from is systemic judgmentalism, resulting from a lack of love. It’s not that we want to be unloving; on the contrary, we care deeply, as evidenced by how deeply our church invests in educating children right through their college years. But we suffer from a misunderstanding of how to love that generates judgmentalism. How come? We have forgotten the major issue of the Great Controversy—that love requires freedom of choice, despite the inevitable risks. Thus, paradoxically, our very concern about safeguarding the spirituality of our young adults generates a coercive and judgmental counterfeit of love that drives them away in a spirit of toxic anxiety.

Good intentions do not guarantee good results. I may open my car door with no intention of denting yours, but the damage is done just the same—and I may not even realize that I caused your problem.

We will look for solutions to YYA attrition after documenting evidence of the problem and its causes.

Evidence of Systemic Judgmentalism

With Adventists in North America increasingly older in their demographic profile, we obviously suffer YYA attrition. We need not wonder why. ValueGenesis I and II documented that many Adventist youth have felt condemned and unloved by elder members. More recent studies indicate that judgmentalism persists.

In the previous report of this Symposium,[iv] Van G. Hurst, president of the Indiana Conference, asks: “What is causing Adventist youth to leave the local church?” He cites a non-scientific but broad-based study that lists a number of reasons. Here are the first 12 reasons given by the YYAs themselves:

  • Conservative elderly people that criticize us
  • Older folks never let it go if you do mess up so that you will never feel accepted there again.
  • Peer pressure is causing youth to leave.
  • Pushy grown-ups spouting rules instead of a real message
  • Church is boring and often we have non-existent youth groups.
  • The older people make you feel like a sinner and that you do nothing right.
  • Adults freak out over the smallest things like clothing (they need to worry about more important stuff).
  • People judging the youth the ways we dress
  • Church if boring with songs from the 1800’s that I’ve never heard.
  • Crazy old people with really strict views
  • The majority of our views always seem to come from Ellen White.
  • People are constantly looking down and judging the youth.

These future voices from the grave should command our attention. Hurst’s data are replicated in the DMin project of this author, a scientific study of attrition among adult children of SDA clergy. My study identified 40 attrition factors, 11 of them extreme. Nearly all of these could be negatively understood, directly or indirectly, as an expression of judgmentalism.[v]

It bears reemphasis that our problem as Adventists is not that we don’t care about YYAs. In prayer meetings, our predominant concern is their attrition. Often tears are shed. No fair-minded observer could accuse these praying grandparents (most prayer meeting attendees seem to be older members) of not caring about their kids, young and old. And yet many prayer warriors—in the same spirit of concern that stimulates their intercession—form the core group of judgmentalists in the church. What makes them oppressive to YYAs is their confused idea of love as being a forceful “straight testimony” rather than relational mentoring.

Picture the Adventist grandmother who stays up past bedtime to bake cookies for the youth group; then when delivering those cookies she feels compelled to admonish (scold) the teens for what they are wearing or listening to. Her condemnation is done for the sake of Christian love. But talking about love—and even trying to love—is not the same as actually being loving. Even though our intentions are good, we need to learn what love is and how to express it.

Consider Hollywood’s obsession with love, obviously a counterfeit. Could the same thing happen in church—not the world’s over-tolerant perversion of love, but a religious counterfeit of love from the opposite extreme of intolerance?

LEARNING TO LOVE

Biblical love comes not only from a caring heart but an educated mind. Paul said: “It is my prayer that your love may abound more and more, with knowledge and all discernment, so that you may approve what is excellent” (Phil. 1: 9-10).

Without knowledge and discernment that empowers us to approve what is excellent, our attempts to love may find a counterfeit expression in intolerance.

We see this in the agape love chapter, 1 Corinthians 13. Verse 5 says of true love: “It does not insist on its own way.” This is typically interpreted as selfishness, and often is. But there is another way in which people withhold love by insisting on their own way: expecting that everybody agree with their own views of dress, diet, music, worship, and everything else. They canonize their convictions, and anyone out of compliance may become the target of gentle yet judgmental correction, even coercion.

To further clarify the connection between knowledge and love, 1 Corinthians 13:9 warns, “Now we know in part.” Nobody but God knows everything, and true love recognizes this, not only individually but corporately. Loving members and churches humbly tolerate some variance in understanding and expressing Christian standards: “Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom” (2 Cor. 3:17).

The fact that love requires liberty lies at the heart of Great Controversy truth, wherein a God of love extends freedom to His creation, despite its risks, since we must have liberty in order to experience God’s love—and to share it in our churches and communities (including secular campuses). Liberty of conscience is vintage Adventist doctrine, so we all of Christians ought to understand the need for it. Proof that we do not is judgmentalism, generated by a perversion of godly love.

Another evidence that love is lacking is the toxic anxiety throughout our system. “There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear” (1 John 4:18[vi]). . Besides the fear of freedom that robs us of love and causes judgmentalism, other systemic anxieties in North American Adventism are just as toxic, such as:

  • Fear of culture—incarnation as God’s ambassadors in secular society
  • Fear of man—intimidation by church bullies so that we enable them
  • Fear of truth—reluctance to journey on the road of theological discovery
  • Fear of joy—so afraid of emotionalism that worship becomes lifeless
  • Fear of job—career fear that makes leaders hirelings instead of shepherds
  • Fear of funding—dread of financial crisis if benefactors become offended

Each of these systemic anxieties robs the church of its capacity to love, and each is worthy of its own chapter in a new book that must be written soon.

CONCLUSION

A toxic atmosphere in our churches is killing our youth and young adults, which is an early warning that the rest of the Adventist Church in North American church is endangered—as evidenced by our alarmingly aging demographic profile. We desperately need the fresh air of love to cast out systemic anxiety and liberate us in the Spirit to fulfill God’s end-time calling. Then judgmentalism will cease and our young adults will have the freedom to sing their own song. And they will find our churches a safe place to bring home their friends from secular campuses.

[vii]


[i] Quoted in A. Allan Martin, “Burst the Bystander Effect: Making a Discipling Difference with Young Adults.” In Roger Dudley, ed., Ministering to Millennials: a complete report on the 180° Symposium (Lincoln, NE: AdventSource, 2009), 112. Hereafter cited as Millennials.

[ii] Ed Dickerson, “Suffer the Little Children (and the young adults),” in Millennials, 48.

[iii] Martin, Ibid.

[iv] Van G. Hurst, “Unity and Ministry Through the Massification of Adventism,” in Millennials, 85.

[v] Martin Weber, “Resolving Young Adult Attrition,” in Millennials, 185ff.

[vi] Unless noted, all scriptures are from the English Standard Version.

Posted by: martinoutlook | October 15, 2009

SDAs and Gays

A story on homosexuals and the Seventh-day Adventist Church was featured in the Journal Star, daily newspaper of Lincoln, Nebraska (Thursday, October 15 edition; also posted online as the lead item: http://journalstar.com). It reports on two California producers doing a film documentary about gays who have a Seventh-day Adventist background. The producers visited Lincoln during a nationwide road trip in which they are interviewing Adventists and ex-Adventists who have a homosexual orientation or are sympathetic toward gays. To promote their project, the producers are seeking exposure in local media markets.

Although the Journal Star reporter perhaps shares the mainstream media’s pro-homosexual bias, she seems fair-minded, having contacted the regional headquarters of the SDA Church to invite a response. As communication director for the Mid-America Union, I provided her with a special statement from Mid-America Union president Roscoe J. Howard III, plus the official SDA church statement on homosexuality. She published Howard’s statement in its entirety as a sidebar (reproduced below).

My assessment: Lincoln residents with an Adventist background who have homosexual inclinations or sympathies received favorable media exposure, but the SDA Church in Mid-America also had opportunity to witness to our community. The statement of our president confirmed our commitment to biblical marriage while also inviting anyone of a homosexual orientation to fellowship with us and experience God’s grace by visiting Adventist worship services.

Here now is the statement from Roscoe J. Howard III, Mid-America Union president:

Seventh-day Adventists are committed to traditional marriage between a man and a woman as a legacy of our Judeo-Christian heritage. The Bible makes clear that homosexuality violates natural relations as ordained by our Creator (e.g., Romans 1:22-28). Thus we could not honor the Scriptures while also supporting homosexual conduct. Since God’s grace reaches out to everyone, homosexuals are welcome to find fellowship and healing in attending Adventist worship services. But anyone who becomes a member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, or is an employee of the denomination, must be willing to limit sexual behavior within sacred matrimony between a man and a woman.

Posted by: martinoutlook | September 25, 2009

A Story of Two Churches

What’s the best thing we can do for our pastors during Pastoral Appreciation Month in October? Pray? Yes—and then help fulfill those prayers by supporting their leadership.

Let me tell you about two churches in one district where I was pastor. Neither had experienced growth for years. Church #1 embraced change, while church #2 resisted. Church #1 rallied to a shared vision under my leadership, while elders at the other one opposed change or simply held their peace.

What happened? Church #1 began by making Sabbath services friendlier, less formalized. We did nothing radical—just made the service flow worshipfully like a river, singing simple but heartfelt praise songs. The effect was profound. Attendance grew. An assistant secretary of the U.S. Navy, moving to our city after retiring from the Pentagon, went church shopping and chose our congregation. He had known Adventist truth for years, but now his heart was fulfilled in Sabbath worship and fellowship. His presence gave an immediate and dramatic boost to our stature in the community.

Local pastors invited me to pray with them Thursday mornings. They decided to include Seventh-day Adventists in the annual March for Jesus—even moving the event from Sabbath morning to afternoon to accommodate our participation. When an interdenominational praise band formed, I joined. We played for a Christian festival at the local high school, which then invited me to help student leaders and administrators plan the spiritual elements of graduation weekend. We also played for the annual community Easter celebration, where I gave the sermon.

The city ministerial association elected me to become president. Twice I was called upon to mediate squabbles in non-Adventist churches. The pastor of the largest church, previously an enemy of Adventism, offered to sponsor me as a police chaplain. Through him I met the mayor, who invited me to her home for prayer, sought my spiritual counsel on a civic matter, and presented me with a community service award.

Although some pastors might not take the approach I did, all of this happened without compromising our Seventh-day Adventist message or mission. Two pastors became convinced of the Sabbath. One of them, whom I had lunch every week, accompanied me to Toronto so he could attend my seminar presentation at the World Ministerial Convention that preceded the 2000 General Conference Session.

All this Spirit-filled transformation happened for church #1, which doubled in size. Church #2 witnessed that excitement with deep concern. They renewed their commitment to “historic Adventism,” faithful even unto death. For example: someone objected to members greeting each other in their sanctuary, so church leaders spent thousands of potentially evangelistic dollars building a foyer—then announced that from henceforth the sanctuary must become silent. It did, rather like a graveyard. Soon after, the elder who led the battle for church reverence got into a physical altercation involving the police. (Really.) Community relations took another hit when another self-appointed terrorist of the Testimonies complained about the church’s food bank distributing canned soup with chicken. Lay leaders shut down the operation, quickly solving the problem (for the church—too bad for the neighbors, and never mind Christ’s inconvenient commandment to feed the hungry).

All of this generated a different type of community publicity than church #1 enjoyed. While that congregation flourished, church #2 declined.

Why? Both had the same pastor with the same vision. The main difference was local church leaders being willing to work with their pastor for change.

Yes, opposition did arise in church #1, but elders there confronted it. When somebody complained about our praise singing (“Celebration music!”) or our participation in the city’s March for Jesus (“Collaborating with Babylon!”), or about my putting a simple wooden cross on the platform (“Catholicism!”), other leaders spoke up for me. They also defended me speaking at the community Easter celebration (“Don’t worry—he’s not glorifying the Easter bunny.”). These courageous elders protected me like football linemen guarding their beloved quarterback. Whereas at church #2 I got sacked frequently, leaders in church #1 provided protection to run a powerful offense against the devil. We moved the ball together, scoring early and often for God’s kingdom.

Bottom line: If you want to do something nice during Pastoral Appreciation Month, then appreciate your pastors enough to support them when attacked. Even if you can’t agree with them in everything, you can pray for them—and then work together in positive new ways.

The following is an editorial in the October issue of Outlook magazine.

Posted by: martinoutlook | September 18, 2009

A Story of Two Churches

What’s the best thing we can do for our pastors during Pastoral Appreciation Month in October? Pray? Yes—and then help fulfill those prayers by supporting their leadership.

Let me tell you about two churches in one district where I was pastor. Neither had experienced growth for years. Church #1 embraced change, while church #2 resisted. Church #1 rallied to a shared vision under my leadership, while elders at the other one opposed change or simply held their peace.

What happened? Church #1 began by making Sabbath services friendlier, less formalized. We did nothing radical—just made the service flow worshipfully like a river, singing simple but heartfelt praise songs. The effect was profound. Attendance grew. An assistant secretary of the U.S. Navy, moving to our city after retiring from the Pentagon, went church shopping and chose our congregation. He had known Adventist truth for years, but now his heart was fulfilled in Sabbath worship and fellowship such as he not not experienced before. His presence gave an immediate and dramatic boost to our stature in the community.

Local pastors invited me to pray with them Thursday mornings. They decided to include Seventh-day Adventists in the annual March for Jesus—even moving the event from Sabbath morning to afternoon to accommodate our participation. When an interdenominational praise band formed, I joined. We played for a Christian festival at the local high school, which then invited me to help student leaders and administrators plan the spiritual elements of graduation weekend. We also played for the annual community Easter celebration, where I gave the sermon.

The city ministerial association elected me to become president. Twice I was called upon to mediate squabbles in non-Adventist churches. The pastor of the largest church, previously an enemy of Adventism, offered to sponsor me as a police chaplain. Through him I met the mayor, who invited me to her home for prayer, sought my spiritual counsel on a civic matter, and presented me with a community service award.

Although some pastors might not take the approach I did, all of this happened without compromising our Seventh-day Adventist message or mission. Two pastors became convinced of the Sabbath. One of them, whom I had lunch every week, accompanied me to Toronto so he could attend my seminar presentation at the World Ministerial Convention that preceded the 2000 General Conference Session.

All this Spirit-filled transformation happened for church #1, which doubled in size. Church #2 witnessed that excitement with deep concern. They renewed their commitment to “historic Adventism,” faithful even unto death. For example: someone objected to members greeting each other in their sanctuary, so church leaders spent thousands of potentially evangelistic dollars building a foyer—then announced that from henceforth the sanctuary must become silent. It did, rather like a graveyard. Soon after, the elder who led the battle for church reverence got into a physical altercation involving the police. (Really.) Community relations took another hit when another self-appointed terrorist of the Testimonies complained about the church’s food bank distributing canned soup with chicken. Lay leaders shut down the operation, quickly solving the problem (for the church—too bad for the neighbors, and never mind Christ’s inconvenient commandment to feed the hungry).

All of this generated a different type of community publicity than church #1 enjoyed. While that congregation flourished, church #2 declined.

Why? Both had the same pastor with the same vision. The main difference was local church leaders being willing to work with their pastor for change.

Yes, opposition did arise in church #1, but elders there confronted it. When somebody complained about our praise singing (“Celebration music!”) or our participation in the city’s March for Jesus (“Collaborating with Babylon!”), or about my putting a simple wooden cross on the platform (“Catholicism!”), other leaders spoke up for me. They also defended me speaking at the community Easter celebration (“Don’t worry—he’s not glorifying the Easter bunny.”). These courageous elders protected me like football linemen guarding their beloved quarterback. Whereas at church #2 I got sacked frequently, leaders in church #1 provided protection to run a powerful offense against the devil. We moved the ball together, scoring early and often for God’s kingdom.

Bottom line: If you want to do something nice during Pastoral Appreciation Month, then appreciate your pastors enough to support them when attacked. Even if you can’t agree with them in everything, you can pray for them—and then work together in positive new ways.

Posted by: martinoutlook | September 11, 2009

Synagogue just discovered from time of Jesus

A dramatic archeological discovery has just been announced of great significance to the life and times of Jesus: the remains of a synagogue in the ancient town of Migdal, by the Sea of Galilee, from which Mary Magdalene is thought to have derived her name. Jesus would have passed by this site and no doubt visited it en route to Jerusalem from Capernaum, “His own city” (Matt. 9:1).

To learn more about it and see a photo from the site, visit:

http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/09/11/jerusalem.synagogue/index.html

Posted by: martinoutlook | September 11, 2009

Remembering 9/11

As one born and raised not far from “ground zero” of the WTC site, I’d like to share a little reflection I wrote about the tragedy. The Adventist Review magazine selected it for publication after 9/11:

“It’s the Ashes”

So this is what it all comes down to …

Ashes. #

Gigahertz computers and wireless uplinks,

mahogany boardrooms and executive washrooms,

plush carpets and power lunch clubs …

Everything amounts to ashes. #

Corporate strategies and market share,

stock prices and interest rates,

quarterly profits or losses …

The bottom line is ashes. #

Office policies and politics,

promotions and retirement plans,

Brooks Brothers suits and the bodies inside …

All ends up in ashes. #

It’s not the economy, after all. It’s the ashes.

Save us, O God, from our ashes. ###

Older Posts »

Categories